Young man, two ways are open before you in life. One points to
degradation and want, the other, to usefulness and wealth. In the old
Grecian races one only, by any possible means, could gain the prize, but
in the momentous race of human life there is no limiting of the prize
to one. No one is debarred from competing; all may succeed, provided the
right methods are followed. Life is not a lottery. Its prizes are not
distributed by chance.
There can hardly be a greater folly, not to say presumption, than
that of so many young men and women who, on setting out in life,
conclude that it is no use to mark out for themselves a course, and then
set themselves with strenuous effort to attain some worthy end; who
conclude, therefore, to commit themselves blindly to the current of
circumstances. Is it anything surprising that those who aim at nothing,
accomplish nothing in life?
No better result could reasonably be expected. Twenty clerks in a
store; twenty apprentices in a ship-yard; twenty young men in a city or
village—all want to get on in the world; most of them expect to succeed.
One of the clerks will become a partner, and make a fortune; one of the
young men will find his calling and succeed. But what of the other
nineteen? They will fail; and miserably fail, some of them. They expect
to succeed, but they aim at nothing; content to live for the day only,
consequently, little effort is put forth, and they reap a reward
accordingly.
Luck! There is no luck about it. The thing is almost as certain as the "rule of three." The young man who will distance his competitors is
he who will master his business; who lives within his income, saving his
spare money; who preserves his reputation; who devotes his leisure
hours to the acquisition of knowledge; and who cultivates a pleasing
manner, thus gaining friends. We hear a great deal about luck. If a man
succeeds finely in business, he is said to have "good luck." He may have
labored for years with this one object in view, bending every energy to
attain it. He may have denied himself many things, and his seemingly
sudden success may be the result of years of hard work, but the world
looks in and says: "He is lucky." Another man plunges into some
hot-house scheme and loses: "He is unlucky." Another man's nose is
perpetually on the grind-stone; he also has "bad luck." No matter if he
follows inclination rather than judgment, if he fails, as he might know
he would did he but exercise one-half the judgment he does possess, yet
he is never willing to ascribe the failure to himself—he invariably
ascribes it to bad luck, or blames some one else.
Luck! There is no such factor in the race for success. Rufus Choate
once said, "There is little in the theory of luck which will bring man
success; but work, guided by thought, will remove mountains or tunnel
them." Carlyle said, "Man know thy work, then do it." How often do we
see the sign: "Gentlemen will not; others must not
loaf in this room." True, gentlemen never loaf, but labor. Fire-flies
shine only in motion. It is only the active who will be singled out to
hold responsible positions. The fact that their ability is manifest is
no sign that they are lucky.
Thiers, of France, was once complimented thus: "It is marvelous, Mr.
President, how you deliver long improvised speeches about which you have
not had time to reflect." His reply was: "You are not paying me a
compliment; it is criminal in a statesman to improvise speeches on
public affairs. Those speeches I have been fifty years preparing."
Daniel Webster's notable reply to Hayne was the result of years of study
on the problem of State Rights. Professor Mowry once told the following
story: "A few years ago a young man went into a cotton factory and
spent a year in the card room. He then devoted another year to learning
how to spin; still another how to weave. He boarded with a weaver, and
was often asking questions. Of course he picked up all kinds of
knowledge. He was educating himself in a good school, and was destined
to graduate high in his class. He became superintendent of a small mill
at $1,500 a year. One of the large mills in Fall River was running
behind hand. Instead of making money the corporation was losing. They
needed a first-class man to manage the mill, and applied to a gentleman
in Boston well acquainted with the leading men engaged
in the manufacture of cotton. He told them he knew of a young man who
would suit them, but they would have to pay him a large salary.
"What salary will he require?" "I cannot tell, but I think you will
have to pay him $6,000 a year." "That is a large sum; we have never paid
so much." "No, probably not, and you have never had a competent man.
The condition of your mill and the story you have told me to-day show
the result. I do not think he would go for less, but I will advise him
to accept if you offer him that salary." The salary was offered, the man
accepted, and he saved nearly forty per cent. of the cost of making the
goods the first year. Soon he had a call from one of the largest
corporations in New England, at a salary of $10,000 per year. He had
been with this company but one year when he was offered another place at $15,000 per year. Now some will say:
"Well, he was lucky, this gentleman was a friend who helped him to a fat
place."
My dear reader, with such we have little patience. It is evident that
this young man was determined to succeed from the first. He mastered
his business, taking time and going thorough. When once the business was
mastered his light began to shine. Possibly the gentleman helped him to
a higher salary than he might have accepted, but it is also evident
that his ability was manifest. The gentleman knew whereof he spoke. The
old proverb that "Circumstances make men" is simply a wolf in wool.
Whether a man is conditioned high or low; in the city or on the farm:
"If he will; he will." "They can who think they can." "Wishes fail but
wills prevail." "Labor is luck." It is better to make our descendants
proud of us than to be proud of our ancestry. There is hardly a
conceivable obstacle to success that some of our successful men have not overcome: "What man has done, man can do." "Strong men have wills; weak ones, wishes."
In the contest, wills prevail. Some writers would make men sticks
carried whither the tide takes them. We have seen that biography vetoes
this theory. Will makes circumstances instead of being ruled by them.
Alexander Stephens, with a dwarf's body, did a giant's work. With a
broken scythe in the race he over-matched those with fine
mowing-machines. Will-power, directed by a mind that was often
replenished, accomplished the desired result.
Any one can drift. It takes pluck to stem an unfavorable current. A
man fails and lays it to circumstances. The fact too frequently is that
he swallowed luxuries beyond his means. A gentleman asked a child who
made him. The answer was: "God made me so long—measuring the length of a
baby—and I growed the rest." The mistake of the little deist in leaving
out the God of his growth illustrates a conviction: We are what we make
ourselves.
Garfield once said: "If the power to do hard work is not talent it is
the best possible substitute for it." Things don't turn up in this
world until some one turns them up. A pound of pluck is worth a ton
of luck. Luck is a false light; you may follow it to ruin, but never to
success. If a man has ability which is reinforced by energy, the fact
is manifest, and he will not lack opportunities. The fortunes of mankind
depend so much upon themselves, that it is entirely legitimate to
enquire by what means each may make or mar his own happiness; may
achieve success or bring upon himself the sufferings of failure.
Comments
Post a Comment